<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Does Smokin Aces blow smoke ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KCHarrison</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>KCHarrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I just saw this movie today, and actually rather liked it.  I thought that Piven did a good job of showing someone completely unraveling.  I thought that Common showed he could be a decent actor, and that Ryan Reynolds stole the movie. 

Was it perfect?  No, but it was entertaining.  It was stylized but without allowing the stylization to become more important than the storylines which were decently complex and intertwined.  I liked the fact that in the beginning, the storylines are set up and continued by different "narrators", each giving their own perspective.  

Jason Bateman's character was wonderfully weird.  The creepy grandmother with the Ritalin dependent nutty kid were both extremely off-putting, but I think it served to underscore the cowardice of the ex-cop in that situation.  

All in all, I thought it was a good movie - and everyone should feel free to make up their own mind about it.

-k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw this movie today, and actually rather liked it.  I thought that Piven did a good job of showing someone completely unraveling.  I thought that Common showed he could be a decent actor, and that Ryan Reynolds stole the movie. </p>
<p>Was it perfect?  No, but it was entertaining.  It was stylized but without allowing the stylization to become more important than the storylines which were decently complex and intertwined.  I liked the fact that in the beginning, the storylines are set up and continued by different &#8220;narrators&#8221;, each giving their own perspective.  </p>
<p>Jason Bateman&#8217;s character was wonderfully weird.  The creepy grandmother with the Ritalin dependent nutty kid were both extremely off-putting, but I think it served to underscore the cowardice of the ex-cop in that situation.  </p>
<p>All in all, I thought it was a good movie - and everyone should feel free to make up their own mind about it.</p>
<p>-k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Skeletor - I find it in poor taste to compare this movie to being euthanized like Barbaro. A lot of people loved that horse, and he was euthanized out of necessity not because he had become unnecessary, much like the portrait this author paints of this film.

I don't usually let others dictate whether a movie is good or not. If I want to see it I will see it, unless there is an overwhelming majority of all people watching the movie, all reviewers, etc. saying it absolutely sucked. Still, I would wait until it came out on DVD and form my own opinion.

I've learned the saying....opinions are like assholes is the absolute truth. I also believe Hollywood no longer makes movies like it used to, and the standards Americans hold for movies is poor, liking the crap that is monotonous and the same as everything else and bashing originality in movies. Everything has to be compared to something else because apparently we've run out of original thought in this world.

I guess not every movie can be &lt;em&gt;Casablanca&lt;/em&gt; eh?

Until we as Americans remember what good cinema is, remember what actors &#038; actresses stood for, and remember that trashy is usually a sign of pathetic not a "future hero for my daughter or son" then no movie is going to please every person. 

Get more &lt;em&gt;Godfathers&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Gone with the Winds&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Psychos&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;To Kill a Mockingbirds&lt;/em&gt;. Otherwise, the crap will never go away. No movie in this recent era, not even &lt;em&gt;Pulp Fiction&lt;/em&gt; can compare to movies made in the hey day of Hollywood. Unfortunately, it seems those Golden Days are gone so we are all going to have to agree to disagree with what is now a "good film" and what "sucks".

You just have to realize that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeletor - I find it in poor taste to compare this movie to being euthanized like Barbaro. A lot of people loved that horse, and he was euthanized out of necessity not because he had become unnecessary, much like the portrait this author paints of this film.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t usually let others dictate whether a movie is good or not. If I want to see it I will see it, unless there is an overwhelming majority of all people watching the movie, all reviewers, etc. saying it absolutely sucked. Still, I would wait until it came out on DVD and form my own opinion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned the saying&#8230;.opinions are like assholes is the absolute truth. I also believe Hollywood no longer makes movies like it used to, and the standards Americans hold for movies is poor, liking the crap that is monotonous and the same as everything else and bashing originality in movies. Everything has to be compared to something else because apparently we&#8217;ve run out of original thought in this world.</p>
<p>I guess not every movie can be <em>Casablanca</em> eh?</p>
<p>Until we as Americans remember what good cinema is, remember what actors &#038; actresses stood for, and remember that trashy is usually a sign of pathetic not a &#8220;future hero for my daughter or son&#8221; then no movie is going to please every person. </p>
<p>Get more <em>Godfathers</em>, <em>Gone with the Winds</em>, <em>Psychos</em> and <em>To Kill a Mockingbirds</em>. Otherwise, the crap will never go away. No movie in this recent era, not even <em>Pulp Fiction</em> can compare to movies made in the hey day of Hollywood. Unfortunately, it seems those Golden Days are gone so we are all going to have to agree to disagree with what is now a &#8220;good film&#8221; and what &#8220;sucks&#8221;.</p>
<p>You just have to realize that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KidLee</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>KidLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>
Some of you people should just stop watching movies. Wes, no one said tarantino or ritchie created the idea of style over substance, they just do it well. Smokin Aces is an attempt at that bit falls far short. 

Mardav,

All of this genius you are reading into this film is unwarranted. We're talking about the man responsible for Buffy The Vampire Slayer. This stylization intentional nor is it original. It's Cheap crap and a waste of both time and money. 

Veee and Skeletor have the right idea. If you want to see a film worth your time go see The Fountain or Pans Labyrinth. &lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you people should just stop watching movies. Wes, no one said tarantino or ritchie created the idea of style over substance, they just do it well. Smokin Aces is an attempt at that bit falls far short. </p>
<p>Mardav,</p>
<p>All of this genius you are reading into this film is unwarranted. We&#8217;re talking about the man responsible for Buffy The Vampire Slayer. This stylization intentional nor is it original. It&#8217;s Cheap crap and a waste of both time and money. </p>
<p>Veee and Skeletor have the right idea. If you want to see a film worth your time go see The Fountain or Pans Labyrinth. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mardav</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mardav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Yes, the ending was a bit of a dull thud, but that seemed to be a classic bit of studio interference. The rest of the movie is weird, but it is orchestrated weirdness and has the feeling of something deliberate and semi-surreal. The samurai sword editing style sometimes supports the director's quirky style, but generally defeats it. This is definitely a "see twice" movie and I'll know more after my second round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the ending was a bit of a dull thud, but that seemed to be a classic bit of studio interference. The rest of the movie is weird, but it is orchestrated weirdness and has the feeling of something deliberate and semi-surreal. The samurai sword editing style sometimes supports the director&#8217;s quirky style, but generally defeats it. This is definitely a &#8220;see twice&#8221; movie and I&#8217;ll know more after my second round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>I thought it was one of those movies where you just go and have fun without leaning on technicalities. Yes the timing was off, yes they seem to try to cram a lot of info into the beginning and then also at the end before turning into a serious bummer of a fade out. HOWEVER, all through-out there always seemed to be something going on and maybe it was just pure eye-candy and such but it entertained me and my date both.

As for the Tremors they were shown to be a reckless lot of unprofessional hitmen and their take down was not surprising in the least bit...heck their earlier hit showed one of them accidentally shot the other and had a gun blow up in his face and ect. They were just pure chaos throwing themselves around and primed to implode upon themselves.

I do not get rhe SNATCH comparisons you make...movie is not like Snatch and I also do not get the Quentin Tarintino comparisions critics make of the film...sure there was violence loads of characters, and quirkiness, but Quentin did not invent those nor did Guy Ritchie and it is a shame anytime someone does something violent and like this they automaticaly get compared to those as if they are trying to rip them off...I gues people should just quit writing violent movies because Q.T. has already done it and is the master and only he allowed to...ha ha that's just silly.

Smokin Aces was not perfect, but it was loads of movie fun regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was one of those movies where you just go and have fun without leaning on technicalities. Yes the timing was off, yes they seem to try to cram a lot of info into the beginning and then also at the end before turning into a serious bummer of a fade out. HOWEVER, all through-out there always seemed to be something going on and maybe it was just pure eye-candy and such but it entertained me and my date both.</p>
<p>As for the Tremors they were shown to be a reckless lot of unprofessional hitmen and their take down was not surprising in the least bit&#8230;heck their earlier hit showed one of them accidentally shot the other and had a gun blow up in his face and ect. They were just pure chaos throwing themselves around and primed to implode upon themselves.</p>
<p>I do not get rhe SNATCH comparisons you make&#8230;movie is not like Snatch and I also do not get the Quentin Tarintino comparisions critics make of the film&#8230;sure there was violence loads of characters, and quirkiness, but Quentin did not invent those nor did Guy Ritchie and it is a shame anytime someone does something violent and like this they automaticaly get compared to those as if they are trying to rip them off&#8230;I gues people should just quit writing violent movies because Q.T. has already done it and is the master and only he allowed to&#8230;ha ha that&#8217;s just silly.</p>
<p>Smokin Aces was not perfect, but it was loads of movie fun regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeletor</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeletor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>The reviewer here paints a picture of one horribly messed up movie that stumbles as it comes out of the gate and needs to be euthanised like that famous racing horse that won the kentucky derby! Ahh well, not all movies are as great as we want them to be but I agree with comment number one, thanks for the warning, I guess I should send you my eight bucks for letting me know NOT to waste my time.  :0

SKELETOR WAS HERE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviewer here paints a picture of one horribly messed up movie that stumbles as it comes out of the gate and needs to be euthanised like that famous racing horse that won the kentucky derby! Ahh well, not all movies are as great as we want them to be but I agree with comment number one, thanks for the warning, I guess I should send you my eight bucks for letting me know NOT to waste my time.  :0</p>
<p>SKELETOR WAS HERE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veee</title>
		<link>http://www.li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>veee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://li-reviews.com/2007/01/29/movie-review-does-smokin-aces-blow-smoke/#comment-246</guid>
		<description>thank you author for allowing me to realize my disappointment, BEFORE i spent my 8 hard earned american dollars.    :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you author for allowing me to realize my disappointment, BEFORE i spent my 8 hard earned american dollars.    <img src='http://www.li-reviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
